What are the arguments for and against lowering the voting age?

The arguments for lowering the voting age usually center around the idea of giving young people a voice and allowing them to participate in democracy at an earlier age. Proponents argue that 16- and 17-year-olds are capable of understanding political issues and should have a say in the decisions that will affect their future. They also point to the fact that young people are often affected by policies such as education and climate change, yet are unable to vote on them. However, opponents argue that 16- and 17-year-olds are not mature or informed enough to make important decisions that affect society as a whole. They also argue that younger voters may be swayed by peer pressure or lack the life experience necessary to make informed decisions. Additionally, some believe that the voting age should be consistent across all activities such as purchasing tobacco and enlisting in the military.
This mind map was published on 4 June 2023 and has been viewed 77 times.

You May Also Like

What sports industries does Bain Capital invest in?

How to ensure validity in qualitative research?

What is video analytics for behavioral safety?

How do aquifers form?

What are some effective tools to improve collective intelligence?

Does the IMF prioritize the interests of powerful countries?

How social security is funded?

What are the elements of language structure?

Should 16 year olds be allowed to vote?

What is the impact of lowering the voting age?

What are the different word classes?

What are language families?