Are there any drawbacks or limitations to key encapsulation mechanisms?

While key encapsulation mechanisms (KEMs) offer several advantages, such as providing confidentiality and security, there are certain drawbacks and limitations associated with their use. One key limitation is the potential dependency on the computational hardness assumptions of certain mathematical problems, such as factoring large numbers or solving the discrete logarithm problem. If these assumptions are broken or feasible attacks are developed, it could render the security of KEMs compromised. Moreover, the performance of KEMs can sometimes be slower compared to other encryption methods, leading to increased computational overhead. Additionally, the scalability of KEMs has been a concern, as large-scale deployments might be challenging due to the sheer number of public-private key pairs generated and used. Despite these limitations, ongoing research and development efforts aim to address these drawbacks and enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of key encapsulation mechanisms.
This mind map was published on 4 February 2024 and has been viewed 96 times.

You May Also Like

What are some famous art and photography collaborations?

How can AI be used to understand consumer preferences?

How to set up alerts in SolarWinds?

What are the basic concepts and terminology used in Godot Engine?

What is collaborative filtering?

How does hybrid recommendation system combine different techniques?

What is a key encapsulation mechanism?

How is key encapsulation different from other encryption techniques?

What are the common options and parameters for dd?

What is the purpose of the Linux command dd?

How can a manual fallback policy be developed and documented?

What are the stages of prenatal development?